Folk
A texting coach and assistant that tracks goals, email and reminders, with a free plan.
Group: Personal agents you message
Folk is an assistant you text on iMessage, Telegram or WhatsApp. Its FAQ describes habit and goal check-ins, email search, web browsing, reminders, meeting notes, phone calls to your own number and background tasks, with connections to Gmail, Google Calendar, Outlook, Notion, Slack and more.
The decision in plain English
Check what you connect before you rely on it. Folk's FAQ says the free plan has no card and no expiry, and that you can run up to 3 background tasks free. TechCrunch quotes Pro as $8.33 a month; Folk's own page lists $9.99 a month or $99.99 a year, so we use the vendor figure.
Best fit
People who want a texting assistant that nudges them on goals and habits and connects to common work apps.
Poor fit
Anyone who needs an independently audited security attestation; we did not find one in this check.
Documented capabilities
Vendor statements, not verified task outcomes.
Permissions and human control
- Folk's FAQ lists one-tap connections to Gmail, Google Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Outlook, Teams, Notion, Slack, Linear, Todoist, Strava and bank accounts. These are vendor statements; review each connection you grant.
Documented controls do not prove that an agent always follows them.
Limits and open questions
- Free plan limits background tasks to 3 at a time (vendor FAQ)
- Calls only your own verified number, per the FAQ
- Described by the vendor; not tested by AgentComparison
Privacy and security
Folk's FAQ says it does not and will not train models on your conversations and does not sell them. We did not review its full privacy policy or any audit.
Common questions about Folk
What is Folk for?
People who want a texting assistant that nudges them on goals and habits and connects to common work apps. The vendor describes it as: Folk is an assistant you text on iMessage, Telegram or WhatsApp. Its FAQ describes habit and goal check-ins, email search, web browsing, reminders, meeting notes, phone calls to your own number and background tasks, with connections to Gmail, Google Calendar, Outlook, Notion, Slack and more.
Who should look elsewhere?
Anyone who needs an independently audited security attestation; we did not find one in this check.
How much does Folk cost?
Folk's FAQ says the product is free forever with no credit card, and that Pro is $9.99 a month or $99.99 a year. TechCrunch's $8.33 a month matches the annual price divided by 12.
What can it access and what needs my approval?
Folk's FAQ lists one-tap connections to Gmail, Google Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Outlook, Teams, Notion, Slack, Linear, Todoist, Strava and bank accounts. These are vendor statements; review each connection you grant.
What happens to my data?
Folk's FAQ says it does not and will not train models on your conversations and does not sell them. We did not review its full privacy policy or any audit.
Has AgentComparison tested it?
No. This record is built from the vendor's own documentation, checked 2026-10-03. Vendor claims are attributed, not confirmed.
How to evaluate Folk yourself
- Pick one low-risk task that matches its documented capabilities: texts reminders, goal check-ins and habit streaks.
- Write the expected output and what counts as failure before you start.
- Connect the minimum access needed, and check approval settings first.
- Run it twice and compare, then review every action it took.
- Check cost after any free allowance. Unknown price is not free.
Related
Sources and history
- https://www.folk.com/faq · official · read 1 October 2026
- https://www.folk.com/docs · official · read 1 October 2026
- https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/03/all-the-ai-agents-that-can-live-in-your-text-messages/ · official · read 1 October 2026
Change history
- 2026-10-03: Added from the TechCrunch roundup of 3 October 2026 (used as a lead only) after checking the vendor's own pages. Documentation research only.
Documentation overview expanded with current pricing/access sources. No hands-on results claimed.
Report a correction